|
|
:: New SATs 2005...Good/Bad?
|
|
 Vicky writes: ""Three hours of misery are apparently not enough. Now the makers of the SAT want to shape what kids learn throughout four years of high school. True, students have always had to brush up on vocabulary and take practice tests before the SAT, but now the College Entrance Examination Board, which owns the test, is developing the " New SAT," an exhaustive revision largely intended to mold the U.S. secondary-school system to its liking. The College Board wants schools to produce better writers, so the New SAT will require an essay. The board thinks grammar is important..."
-Text from TIME Magazine, Oct. 27th 2003
Well, this should be old news, surprisingly people haven't taken this issue too seriously. The SATs have always been stressful for high school students. Now it can change the way colleges accept students. The scoring rate went up from a perfect 1600 to 2400, which makes it harder to study for. They included an essay portion to the SAT, which is important, but not absolutely neccessary, in my opinion.
For sure this test is most likely to cause a lot of disruption including:
- favoring girls over boys (it's been proven that girls are more literal in expressing opinions)
-affecting how English is taught in high school
-making SAT scores more subjective
-limiting students in urban areas to be accepted into a good college
Issues that should be taken into deep consideration. Especially for students in the urban area, having the reputation of poor grammar skills. This will not only limit African Americans from going to college, but all those living in urban communites, which can include Latino, and low class student. Does "education" really need to go this far?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sorry, Comments are not available for this article. | | | | |
Re: New SATs 2005...Good/Bad? (Score: 1) by Sam on Friday, October 14, 2005 @ 15:46:37 EDT (User Info | Send a Message) | | Good article. SAT's were always about how smart you are from an anglo american point of view. With republicans in conrol of so much of the govt, this latest change in SAT testing does not surprise me. |
| | | | |
Re: New SATs 2005...Good/Bad? (Score: 1) by HaitianPrince06 on Thursday, October 27, 2005 @ 22:40:46 EDT (User Info | Send a Message) | | There is no need to complain about it because it is required to get accepted into college. So one might as well prepare thyself better. LOL...I know ya'll loving that....... |
Re: New SATs 2005...Good/Bad? (Score: 1) by Vicky on Sunday, October 30, 2005 @ 18:50:12 EST (User Info | Send a Message) | | There is nothing really you can do about it now? But really what makes the change in the first place? Was it really an issue, that they had to change the requirements for how students get into college? |
| | | | | | |
|
Average Score: 3.83 Votes: 6

|
|
|
|
|
|
• Vancouver in "Re: Mother Nature's Wrath" • Vicky in "Re: Mother Nature's Wrath" • Vancouver in "Re: Mother Nature's Wrath" • Vicky in "Re: New SATs 2005...Good/Bad?" • HaitianPrince06 in "Re: New SATs 2005...Good/Bad?" • Manno4 in "Re: The Bleaching Cream Dilemma" • Sam in "Re: New SATs 2005...Good/Bad?" • Lafemdelamer in "Re: Did Kayne Give Men An Excuse Not To buy Her That ''Ring..." • Vancouver in "Hans has some work to do" • Mnique in "Re: Tall Vs Short People"
|
|
|
|
|
|
All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. The comments are property of their posters, all the rests © 2001-2010 Kiskeyan Connection™ We received 15412318 visit(s) since December 2001 Page Generated in: 0.23 Seconds
|